clearlaw logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Pricing
  • Blog
Login Get Started for Free
  1. Blog » Withdrawn Appeal Under Vivad se Vishwas: Vimal Kumar Malu vs. ITO Ward-34(1) for AY 2015-16

Withdrawn Appeal Under Vivad se Vishwas: Vimal Kumar Malu vs. ITO Ward-34(1) for AY 2015-16

Team Clearlaw  Team Clearlaw
Jul 30, 2024
Income Tax

Withdrawn Appeal Under Vivad se Vishwas

Case Overview

ITA No. 3848/DEL/2019 addressed the appeal of Vimal Kumar Malu against the income tax assessment by ITO Ward-34(1), New Delhi for the assessment year 2015-16.

Background

The appeal was filed against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) order dated December 5, 2018. The main contention revolved around the assessment order passed on the same day by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Decision to Withdraw

Vimal Kumar Malu decided to withdraw the appeal, choosing to avail the benefits of the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. This decision was facilitated by the submission of a formal request to the tribunal, stating his intention to not pursue the case further under the scheme.

Legal Implications

The tribunal noted that the Departmental Representative had no objections to the withdrawal. The appeal was formally dismissed as withdrawn, with provisions allowing for potential restoration under certain conditions if the benefits of the scheme could not be availed for bona fide reasons.

Conclusion

The tribunal’s acceptance of the withdrawal showcases the impact of the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme on reducing litigation and providing taxpayers a means to settle disputes amicably. The case was closed with the dismissal of the appeal on May 12, 2022.

Withdrawn Appeal Under Vivad se Vishwas: Vimal Kumar Malu vs. ITO Ward-34(1) for AY 2015-16

Categories

  • Income Tax

Recent Post’s

  • Inder Parstah Charitable Trust vs CIT (E), Chandigarh: Registration Denial Under Section 12AA and 80G
  • Babu Lal, Faridabad vs. ITO Ward-1(2), Faridabad: Case Filed for 2010-11 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
  • Ram Kumar Dhiamn vs. ITO Ward-26(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Due to Duplicate Filing
  • Saju Kozhikkadan Paul vs. ITO Ward-53(5), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Dismissed Due to Invalid Return
  • Naresh Kumar Jain vs. ITO Ward-47(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2011-12 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Research Platform
clearlaw footer logo

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform.

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Signup
  • Blog
  • Pricing

Search By

  • Appelent
  • Judge Name
  • Lawyer Name
  • Respondent

Legal

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy

Contact Us

  • Clearlaw
  • 9876543210
  • B-78 Noida Sector 60

Copyright © Clearlaw All Rights Reserved.

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy