The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed an appeal by the DCIT against Priytam Plaschem Pvt. Ltd., concerning unexplained credits for share capital and share premium, underlining the judicial approach to assessing such matters.
The case originated from an addition of Rs. 3,00,00,000 made by the Assessing Officer regarding unexplained credits which the CIT(A) deleted, prompting an appeal by the DCIT.
During the proceedings, it was noted that the credits were received as share capital from Mekastar Finlease Ltd., which the CIT(A) had earlier considered genuine based on similar transactions upheld by the ITAT and the High Court. The Revenue challenged this on various grounds, but the ITAT, relying on substantial precedents, dismissed the appeal, upholding the deletion of the addition.
This case highlights the crucial role of detailed documentation and the proper application of legal precedents in tax disputes concerning the genuineness of financial transactions. It also underscores the principle that the assessee need not prove the source of the source once the immediate source is established as credible.
Unexplained Credits and Judicial Scrutiny: DCIT vs. Priytam Plaschem P. Ltd., ITA No. 6038/DEL/2019
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform