Vintron Convergys Ltd., a New Delhi-based company, filed an appeal against the decision of CIT(A)-24 concerning the assessment year 2015-16. This document provides an analysis of the judicial proceedings and the implications for tax jurisprudence.
The appeal challenges the order dated March 26, 2019, issued by the CIT(A)-24, New Delhi. The primary contention revolves around the alleged lack of an effective opportunity for a hearing, which the appellant claims violates the principles of natural justice.
On September 2, 2022, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi Bench, comprising Judicial Member Shri C.M. Garg and Accountant Member Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia, heard the appeal. Acknowledging the appellant’s concerns regarding the hearing process, the Tribunal decided to restore the case to the file of CIT(A) for a fresh adjudication.
The decision underscores the importance of providing a fair hearing to all parties involved in a legal dispute. This case highlights procedural fairness as a critical component of the judicial process in tax appeals. The restoration of the case for a fresh hearing suggests a move towards ensuring that all factual and legal arguments are thoroughly considered.
This analysis of ITA No. 4766/DEL/2019 reflects the ongoing efforts to uphold justice in tax litigation by ensuring that procedural norms and the principles of natural justice are adhered to, thereby fostering a transparent and fair tax system.
Tax Appeal of Vintron Convergys Ltd. vs. ACIT, Circle-26(2), New Delhi for Assessment Year 2015-16
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform