Case Number: ITA 6706/DEL/2019
Appellant: Supreme Brahmaputra (JV), New Delhi
Respondent: ACIT – CPC – TDS, Ghaziabad
Assessment Year: 2013-14
Filed on: August 13, 2019
Order Date: August 31, 2020
The appeal involves the appellant, Supreme Brahmaputra (JV), challenging the penalty levied under Section 234E for late filing fees as confirmed by CIT(A). The matter centers on the interpretation and application of Section 234E concerning the timing of levy of fees for delayed TDS statements, with significant references to legislative changes effective June 1, 2015.
The Tribunal, led by members R.K. Panda and Sudhanshu Srivastava, concluded that the penalties under Section 234E, as applied to the period before the amendments took effect on June 1, 2015, were inappropriately applied. They emphasized that such amendments are to be treated as prospective, not retrospective. As a result, the appeal by Supreme Brahmaputra (JV) was allowed, and the penalty charges were overturned.
This case underscores the importance of the precise application of tax laws and the boundaries of retrospective application of legislative changes. It highlights the Tribunal’s role in interpreting tax provisions while ensuring that taxpayers are not unfairly penalized due to unclear legislative intent.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform