The case of Rolls-Royce PLC versus the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in ITA No. 116/DEL/2019 highlights the effective use of the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) in resolving international tax disputes. This analysis provides insights into the proceedings that led to the withdrawal of the appeal by Rolls-Royce.
Rolls-Royce PLC, a major global entity in the engineering sector, faced tax challenges from the Indian tax authorities for the assessment year 2015-16. The dispute was centered around tax obligations determined by the DCIT, International Taxation Circle in New Delhi.
The MAP is a critical tool under tax treaties for resolving disputes involving double taxation or tax treaty interpretations. In this case, Rolls-Royce opted for MAP, leading to a resolution agreement on June 15, 2023, which effectively settled the issues contested in the appeal.
The resolution under MAP illustrates the importance of diplomatic negotiations in tax matters, especially for multinational corporations operating across multiple tax jurisdictions. This outcome not only provided clarity to Rolls-Royce but also sets a precedent for other companies facing similar tax disputes.
The dismissal of ITA No. 116/DEL/2019 following the MAP agreement is a landmark in the use of international tax treaties to resolve disputes and avoid prolonged litigation. This case study underscores the effectiveness of MAP and its impact on corporate tax strategies globally.
Resolution of Rolls-Royce Tax Appeal through MAP: Analysis of ITA No. 116/DEL/2019
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform