clearlaw logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Pricing
  • Blog
Login Get Started for Free
  1. Blog » PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Central Circle-7, New Delhi – 2018-19 Assessment

PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Central Circle-7, New Delhi – 2018-19 Assessment

Team Clearlaw  Team Clearlaw
Mar 07, 2024
Income Tax

PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Central Circle-7, New Delhi – 2018-19 Assessment

PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Central Circle-7, New Delhi – Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi – ITA No.749/DEL/2022 – Assessment Year: 2018-19

Summary

This case pertains to the appeal filed by PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt. Ltd., based in Gurgaon, against the order of the Assessing Officer (National Faceless Assessment Centre), Delhi, for the assessment year 2018-19. The primary issue revolves around the computation and disallowance of Advertisement, Marketing, and Promotion (AMP) expenses. The case was heard by a bench comprising SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER, and Ms. ASTHA CHANDRA, JUDICIAL MEMBER.

Background

PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. engaged in trading and manufacturing soft drink beverages and snack food items, contended several points against the order passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC), including but not limited to the assumption of jurisdiction, computation of tax demand despite NIL income, and errors in Transfer Pricing Adjustment on account of AMP Expenses.

Final Judgment

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, after reviewing the case details and the precedents set by previous judgments in favor of PepsiCo India, allowed the appeal. The bench specifically pointed out that there was no substantial change in the facts of the case that would lead to a different conclusion than those of the precedents. Hence, the addition made by the revenue authorities was directed to be deleted, thus ruling in favor of PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt. Ltd.

Conclusion

The case highlights important considerations for multinational corporations in terms of jurisdictional authority, assessment proceedings, and transfer pricing adjustments, particularly concerning AMP Expenses. This decision underscores the appellate tribunal’s consistency with its precedents and provides a significant point of reference for similar cases in the future.

Team Clearlaw

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Categories

  • Income Tax

Recent Post’s

  • Inder Parstah Charitable Trust vs CIT (E), Chandigarh: Registration Denial Under Section 12AA and 80G
  • Babu Lal, Faridabad vs. ITO Ward-1(2), Faridabad: Case Filed for 2010-11 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
  • Ram Kumar Dhiamn vs. ITO Ward-26(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Due to Duplicate Filing
  • Saju Kozhikkadan Paul vs. ITO Ward-53(5), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Dismissed Due to Invalid Return
  • Naresh Kumar Jain vs. ITO Ward-47(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2011-12 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Research Platform
clearlaw footer logo

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform.

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Signup
  • Blog
  • Pricing

Search By

  • Appelent
  • Judge Name
  • Lawyer Name
  • Respondent

Legal

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy

Contact Us

  • Clearlaw
  • 9876543210
  • B-78 Noida Sector 60

Copyright © Clearlaw All Rights Reserved.

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy