This article delves into the case of Rajeev Garg vs. ITO, Ward 40(5), New Delhi, where the appellant opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, marking a significant decision in the legal proceedings for the assessment year 2010-11.
Rajeev Garg, challenged by tax arrears and ongoing disputes, chose to settle under the government’s Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, which aims to provide a resolution mechanism for pending tax disputes. This decision was taken during the proceedings of ITA No. 1961/Del/2020, presented before the ITAT Delhi Bench.
The decision to utilize the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme is critical as it reflects a strategic move to mitigate lengthy legal disputes and potential financial burdens associated with continued litigation. The case highlights the procedural aspects and legal considerations involved in opting for such a scheme.
The ITAT, understanding the context and implications of the settlement, consigned the appeal to records, treating it as dismissed for statistical purposes. However, a caveat was set: should the scheme’s application fail, the appellant retains the right to reinstate the appeal. This provision ensures a safety net for the appellant, underscoring the tribunal’s balanced approach.
Rajeev Garg’s decision to settle under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme provides a noteworthy example of alternative dispute resolution in tax litigation. This case serves as an insightful example for taxpayers and legal professionals, offering a lens through which to view strategic decision-making in the face of complex tax disputes.
Opting for Resolution: Rajeev Garg’s Decision to Settle Under Vivad Se Vishwas in ITA 1961/DEL/2020
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform