Case Number: ITA 1872/DEL/2022
Appellant: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., United States
Respondent: DCIT, Int.Taxation, Circle 3(1)(1), New Delhi
Assessment Year: 2018-19
Filed on: 2022-08-18
Order Type: Final Tribunal Order
Date of Order: 2023-02-20
Pronounced on: 2023-02-20
This document provides a detailed overview of the legal proceedings between John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and the DCIT regarding the classification of revenues from online journals and subscriptions. The core of the dispute lies in whether these revenues should be treated as royalties or as business income, significantly impacting the tax implications for the appellant under the assessment year 2018-19.
Presiding over the case were Shri N. K. Billaiya, Accountant Member, and Shri Anubhav Sharma, Judicial Member, representing the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘D’. The hearing and the final pronouncement were conducted on February 13 and February 20, 2023, respectively.
The appellant, represented by Sh. Salil Kapoor and Vibhu Jain, argued that the income received from Indian customers for online journals and subscriptions does not qualify as royalties or Fees for Technical Services (FTS), as contended by the revenue authorities. Instead, they posited these should be considered business income, not subject to withholding tax under the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
The Department of Corporate Income Tax (DCIT) maintained that these revenues are royalties, given their nature and the contractual terms under which they were received, thus subject to applicable taxes under Indian law.
The tribunal noted inconsistencies in the assessment orders passed by the assessing officer, specifically regarding the entity’s name post-merger, which was not updated accordingly. This procedural oversight led to questions about the validity of the assessment itself. The tribunal ultimately sided with the appellant, directing that the revenues should be treated as business income, thus not subject to the higher withholding tax rate applied to royalties.
This case sets a precedent for how revenues from digital goods and services are classified and taxed, not just in India but potentially influencing international taxation policies concerning digital transactions. It underscores the need for clear guidelines and adherence to legal standards in the classification of online revenues.
The tribunal’s decision to classify the revenues from online journals and subscriptions as business income highlights the evolving nature of international tax law, particularly in the digital economy. This ruling could have significant ramifications for other companies operating in similar domains.
Order pronounced in the open court on 20/02/2023 by Shri N. K. Billaiya and Shri Anubhav Sharma.
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. vs DCIT: Legal Battle Over Online Journal Revenue Classification for 2018-19
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform