clearlaw logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Pricing
  • Blog
Login Get Started for Free
  1. Blog » ITA No. 1010/DEL/2022 – Sempitern India vs Ward 2(3), Faridabad – A Detailed Judgment Analysis

ITA No. 1010/DEL/2022 – Sempitern India vs Ward 2(3), Faridabad – A Detailed Judgment Analysis

Team Clearlaw  Team Clearlaw
Mar 14, 2024
Income Tax

ITA No. 1010/DEL/2022 – Sempitern India vs Ward 2(3), Faridabad – A Detailed Judgment Analysis

Introduction

This case analysis pertains to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s decision regarding ITA No. 1010/DEL/2022 between Sempitern India, Faridabad, and Ward 2(3), Faridabad for the assessment year 2019-20. The core issue revolves around the correctness of the addition made under section 143 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, concerning PF & ESI contributions by employees paid beyond the statutory period but before the due date of filing the return under section 139 (1).

Background

The appellant, Sempitern India, is a firm based in Faridabad, Haryana, contested against the order of the ACIT, Ward 2(3), Faridabad regarding the addition made to their income for the assessment year 2019-20. The matter came before the Delhi Bench ‘G’ of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, comprising Honorable Mr. Shamim Yahya, Accountant Member, and Mr. Challa Nagendra Prasad, Judicial Member.

The tribunal examined the appeals filed by different assessees against the orders of ld. CIT (Appeals)-8 for the concerned assessment years. Given the commonality of the issues across the appeals, a collective order was issued.

Key Issue and Tribunal Decision

The crux of the matter was the timing of PF & ESI contributions by the employees, and whether payments made beyond the specified dates in the respective statutes but before the due date for filing return under section 139(1) should impact the taxable income. Drawing on …

ITA No. 1010/DEL/2022 – Sempitern India vs Ward 2(3), Faridabad – A Detailed Judgment Analysis

Team Clearlaw

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Categories

  • Income Tax

Recent Post’s

  • Inder Parstah Charitable Trust vs CIT (E), Chandigarh: Registration Denial Under Section 12AA and 80G
  • Babu Lal, Faridabad vs. ITO Ward-1(2), Faridabad: Case Filed for 2010-11 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
  • Ram Kumar Dhiamn vs. ITO Ward-26(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Due to Duplicate Filing
  • Saju Kozhikkadan Paul vs. ITO Ward-53(5), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Dismissed Due to Invalid Return
  • Naresh Kumar Jain vs. ITO Ward-47(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2011-12 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Research Platform
clearlaw footer logo

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform.

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Signup
  • Blog
  • Pricing

Search By

  • Appelent
  • Judge Name
  • Lawyer Name
  • Respondent

Legal

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy

Contact Us

  • Clearlaw
  • 9876543210
  • B-78 Noida Sector 60

Copyright © Clearlaw All Rights Reserved.

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy