The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi Bench ‘C’ heard the case of Indogreen International versus the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (DCIT), Central Circle, Noida, concerning issues of jurisdiction under Section 153A and related unsecured loans for the assessment year 2012-13. Filed on February 6, 2019, this case represents a significant legal examination of the powers and limitations of tax assessment under specific conditions of search and seizure.
Indogreen International, represented by advocate Sh. Neel Kanth Khandelwal, contested the actions and decisions made by the DCIT following a search and seizure operation conducted on August 26, 2015, as part of the Nimbus group of cases. The primary legal contention centered around the additions of Rs. 1,50,00,000 as unsecured loans deemed income under Section 68 of the IT Act, purportedly without any incriminating material.
During the hearing, the Tribunal considered various legal arguments and precedents. Indogreen International challenged the jurisdiction assumed by the assessing officer under Section 153A and the subsequent assessments made. The firm argued that the additions were made on incorrect grounds without the presence of any incriminating material from the search, violating principles of natural justice.
The counsel for the appellant cited several precedents supporting their position, including the landmark case of CIT Vs. Kabul Chawla, where it was held that additions under Section 153A require the presence of incriminating materials found during the search. Conversely, the Revenue supported their stance by referring to cases like CIT Vs. Raj Kumar Arora, asserting that the additions were justified.
Ultimately, the Tribunal, led by Judicial Member Amit Shukla and Accountant Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, ruled in favor of Indogreen International. They highlighted that no incriminating materials were discovered during the search that could substantiate the large additions made under Section 68. Furthermore, the credibility of the lender, M/s Cindy Goods & Supply Pvt. Ltd., was established, negating the assumption that it was merely a ‘paper company’.
This case underscores the critical importance of adhering to legal standards during tax assessments and searches. By confirming that no additions can be sustained under Section 153A without concrete incriminating evidence, the Tribunal reinforced the principles of fairness and due process in tax proceedings.
The decision also reflects on the procedural integrity required by tax authorities, ensuring that assessments are not only conducted within the bounds of the law but are also backed by substantial evidence.
Indogreen International’s victory serves as a pertinent case study for tax law practitioners and assessors alike, emphasizing the necessity of clear, justifiable evidence when invoking specific tax assessment sections.
The final judgment for this case was pronounced in open court on October 15, 2020, allowing the appeal of Indogreen International and setting aside the impugned additions made by the DCIT.
For further details and legal references, the full tribunal order can be accessed under ITA No. 926/Del/2019 on the ITAT’s official website or through legal case management services.
ITA 926/DEL/2019: Indogreen International vs. DCIT – Jurisdiction and Unsecured Loans
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform