clearlaw logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Pricing
  • Blog
Login Get Started for Free
  1. Blog » Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Decision in ITA No. 758/DEL/2022: Thangzamuan Hangshing versus Ward-72(4)

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Decision in ITA No. 758/DEL/2022: Thangzamuan Hangshing versus Ward-72(4)

Team Clearlaw  Team Clearlaw
Mar 07, 2024
Income Tax

ITA No. 758/DEL/2022: Thangzamuan Hangshing versus Ward-72(4)

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi Bench Decision: Thangzamuan Hangshing versus Ward-72(4)

Case Number: ITA No. 758/DEL/2022
Assessment Year: 2017-18
Appellant: Thangzamuan Hangshing, Gautam Buddha Nagar
Respondent: Ward-72(4), Delhi
Result: Allowed

Introduction

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, delivered a significant verdict in ITA No. 758/DEL/2022, where Thangzamuan Hangshing (the appellant) contested the assessment order issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-72(4), New Delhi, for the assessment year 2017-18. The case revolves around the addition of ₹11,26,494 under section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for unexplained money.

Background

Thangzamuan Hangshing filed his return of income for the assessment year 2017-18 on 20th June 2017, declaring an income of ₹8,30,180. The case was selected for limited scrutiny under CASS to verify the cash deposit during the demonetization period. The assessee contended that the cash was deposited out of withdrawals saved for purchasing a house, which the Assessing Officer (AO) did not accept, leading to the impugned addition.

Appeal Proceedings

The appellant, aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, appealed before the ITAT. The grounds of appeal challenged the legality and the facts of the assessment, including the denial of principle of natural justice.

The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and the material on record, found merit in the appellant’s argument. It noted that undisputedly the appellant had withdrawn the amount from his bank account, and there was no material to suggest utilization of the money for any other purpose.

Final Judgment

The ITAT allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of ₹11,26,494 to the income of the appellant. It highlighted that the authorities below were not justified in confirming the addition and emphasized the need for considering the facts and circumstances of the case truthfully.

Conclusion

This landmark decision underscores the significance of providing adequate opportunity to the assessee and the importance of considering all factual materials before making an addition under section 69A. It sets a precedent on how cases involving unexplained money should be handled, ensuring justice and fairness in the tax assessment process.

Team Clearlaw

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Categories

  • Income Tax

Recent Post’s

  • Inder Parstah Charitable Trust vs CIT (E), Chandigarh: Registration Denial Under Section 12AA and 80G
  • Babu Lal, Faridabad vs. ITO Ward-1(2), Faridabad: Case Filed for 2010-11 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
  • Ram Kumar Dhiamn vs. ITO Ward-26(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Due to Duplicate Filing
  • Saju Kozhikkadan Paul vs. ITO Ward-53(5), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Dismissed Due to Invalid Return
  • Naresh Kumar Jain vs. ITO Ward-47(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2011-12 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Research Platform
clearlaw footer logo

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform.

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Signup
  • Blog
  • Pricing

Search By

  • Appelent
  • Judge Name
  • Lawyer Name
  • Respondent

Legal

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy

Contact Us

  • Clearlaw
  • 9876543210
  • B-78 Noida Sector 60

Copyright © Clearlaw All Rights Reserved.

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy