In a significant judgment by the Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the case between S S SAIB Constructions P.Ltd, based in Delhi, and the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), Faridabad, was brought to a fruitful conclusion for the assessment year 2018-19. This article delves into the details of the case, the arguments presented, and the implications of the final judgment which was ‘Allowed’ in favor of the appellant.
The appellant, S S SAIB Constructions P.Ltd, challenged the disallowance made under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in respect of employees’ contribution to ESI and PF deposited after the due date under the relevant Acts but before the due date for filing the return of income under Section 139(1) of the Act.
The primary issue at stake was whether such disallowances were justified, and if the amendments brought in by the Finance Act, 2021, had retrospective applicability. The appellant contended that the disallowances made by the assessing officer and upheld by CIT (Appeals) were against the principles laid down in various precedents.
The appellant argued that the contributions were remitted to the government account before the due date for filing returns of income, thus should not be disallowed. They relied upon the decision of the jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508 and the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. vs. CIT.
On the other hand, the department argued that the amendments made by the Finance Act, 2021, which clarified certain provisions regarding the due date for such contributions, had retrospective effect and thus supported the disallowance.
The tribunal, considering the submissions and the legal precedents, held that the disallowance of employees’ contributions to ESI and PF made after the due date as per the respective acts but before the due date for filing the return of income under the Income Tax Act was not justified. It was emphasized that such a matter is debatable and the issue has been resolved in favor of the assessees by various judicial precedents.
Furthermore, the tribunal clarified that the amendments brought by the Finance Act, 2021, are effective from 1.04.2021, and hence, cannot have a retrospective effect on the case in question. It ruled in favor of the appellant by allowing the appeal and setting aside the orders of the lower authorities.
This landmark decision sets an important precedent for the treatment of employees’ contributions to PF and ESI. It reinforces the principle that if such contributions are deposited before the due date for filing the return of income, they should not be disallowed. This judgment will significantly impact many similar cases and offers clarity to taxpayers regarding compliance with these provisions.
The insights provided in this analysis shed light on the tribunal’s reasoning and the broader implications of its decision. Taxpayers and practitioners in the field of tax law can draw valuable lessons from this judgment.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform