The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, reviewed the appeal filed by Ravinder Kumar, G B Nagar against the Income Tax Officer (ITO), Noida, pertaining to the assessment year 2019-2020. The case, notable for its comprehensive deliberations on the provisions related to the disallowance made under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning employees’ contributions to ESI and PF, offers significant insights into the tribunal’s approach towards interpretations of statutory provisions and their retrospective applicabilities.
The tribunal allowed the appeal of Ravinder Kumar, setting a precedent on how late deposits of employees’ contributions to ESI and PF should be treated under the Income Tax Act. The decision highlighted the tribunal’s endorsement of a liberal interpretation aligned with the legislative intent behind Section 36(1)(va) and the amendments introduced by the Finance Act, 2021.
This judgment serves as a crucial reference for understanding the intricacies of tax deductions pertaining to employees’ welfare contributions, potentially impacting future cases with similar disputes. It underscores the importance of timely compliance by employers while also offering relief in cases of late contributions, provided they are made before the due date of filing the return of income.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Case – Ravinder Kumar vs. ITO, Noida
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform