clearlaw logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Pricing
  • Blog
Login Get Started for Free
  1. Blog » Income Tax Appeal Result for First Plumbing P. Ltd, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-9(2), New Delhi for Assessment Year 2019-20

Income Tax Appeal Result for First Plumbing P. Ltd, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-9(2), New Delhi for Assessment Year 2019-20

Team Clearlaw  Team Clearlaw
Mar 19, 2024
Income Tax

Income Tax Appeal Result for First Plumbing P. Ltd, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-9(2), New Delhi for Assessment Year 2019-20

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Judgement Analysis

Case Details

Case Number: ITA 1093/DEL/2022
Appellant: First Plumbing P.Ltd, New Delhi
Respondent: ITO, Ward-9(2), New Delhi
Assessment Year: 2019-20
Result: Allowed

Introduction

This article provides an in-depth analysis of the income tax appellate tribunal decision involving First Plumbing P. Ltd, based in New Delhi, and the Income Tax Officer of Ward-9(2), New Delhi. The pivotal assessment year in question is 2019-20.

Summary of the Final Judgment

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, comprising Judicial Member-Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad and Accountant Member-Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia, delivered a notable judgment in the case of First Plumbing P. Ltd vs. ITO, Ward-9(2), New Delhi. The case, referenced as ITA No. 1093/DEL/2022, was decided in favor of the appellant, First Plumbing P. Ltd, thereby allowing the appeal.

The crux of the appeal revolved around the disallowance made under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, related to the employees’ contribution to ESI and PF deposited after the due date under the relevant Acts but before the due date for filing a return of income under Section 139(1) of the Act.

In several instances, despite the issuance of notices, there was no appearance on behalf of the assessees, nor were adjournments sought. However, based on the facts and arguments presented, the bench proceeded to dispose of the appeal.

Legal Analysis

The tribunal meticulously analyzed the submissions and the legislative amendments made by the Finance Act, 2021. It delved into whether the amendments to Sections 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Income Tax Act by inserting Explanations were clarificatory in nature and thereby had retrospective applicability. The bench further examined whether these contributions, if made before the due date for filing the income tax return, should allow for deduction.

The tribunal referenced several precedents, including the landmark decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT, to adjudicate on the matter. Ultimately, it was held that contributions made towards employees’ PF and ESI before filing the return of income were deductible, dismissing the revenue’s argument for disallowance.

Conclusion

The tribunal’s decision to allow the appeal in favor of First Plumbing P. Ltd reiterates the principle that timely compliance with tax laws, even if contributions are made slightly beyond the respective Acts’ deadlines but before the return filing due date, should not be penalized. This judgment sets a significant precedent for similar cases and offers clarity on the interpretation of amendments made by the Finance Act, 2021, concerning employees’ contributions to welfare schemes.

Legal professionals and businesses must note this interpretation for compliance and litigative strategies concerning taxation laws and employee welfare contributions.

Income Tax Appeal Result for First Plumbing P. Ltd, New Delhi vs. ITO, Ward-9(2), New Delhi for Assessment Year 2019-20

Team Clearlaw

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Categories

  • Income Tax

Recent Post’s

  • Inder Parstah Charitable Trust vs CIT (E), Chandigarh: Registration Denial Under Section 12AA and 80G
  • Babu Lal, Faridabad vs. ITO Ward-1(2), Faridabad: Case Filed for 2010-11 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
  • Ram Kumar Dhiamn vs. ITO Ward-26(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Due to Duplicate Filing
  • Saju Kozhikkadan Paul vs. ITO Ward-53(5), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Dismissed Due to Invalid Return
  • Naresh Kumar Jain vs. ITO Ward-47(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2011-12 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Research Platform
clearlaw footer logo

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform.

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Signup
  • Blog
  • Pricing

Search By

  • Appelent
  • Judge Name
  • Lawyer Name
  • Respondent

Legal

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy

Contact Us

  • Clearlaw
  • 9876543210
  • B-78 Noida Sector 60

Copyright © Clearlaw All Rights Reserved.

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy