ITA No. 1389/DEL/2022 is a significant case brought before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘B’, involving appellant Harish Kumar Dhawan and respondent DCIT, Circle-28(1), Delhi. The dispute centered around a penalty imposed on Dhawan despite a settlement under the ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme’ for the assessment year 2016-17. The Tribunal’s final decision allowed the appeal, thereby deleting the penalty.
The appellant, Harish Kumar Dhawan, challenged the penalty levied following a dispute settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Despite the settlement, the Income Tax Department issued a penalty notice, leading Dhawan to appeal the decision.
Dhawan argued that the penalty was unjust as it contradicted the settlement terms under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The responding DCIT maintained that the penalty was valid, necessitating Tribunal arbitration.
The Tribunal meticulously examined submissions from both parties, the legal framework of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and the circumstances under which the penalty was imposed. It found that the imposition of the penalty post-settlement was neither legal nor in line with the scheme’s intentions, highlighting a critical oversight by the assessing officer.
The decision to allow Dhawan’s appeal and delete the penalty sets a precedent on the interpretation and application of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. This case underscores the importance of adhering to the resolution terms agreed upon under the scheme and ensures fairness in the tax dispute resolution process.
Order pronounced on 18th July 2022, marking a significant interpretation of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme in the context of tax penalty disputes.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform