clearlaw logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Pricing
  • Blog
Login Get Started for Free
  1. Blog » Income Tax Appeal Allowed for Dr. Willmar Schwabe India in Amalgamation Case

Income Tax Appeal Allowed for Dr. Willmar Schwabe India in Amalgamation Case

Team Clearlaw  Team Clearlaw
Mar 19, 2024
Income Tax



Income Tax Appeal Allowed for Dr. Willmar Schwabe India in Amalgamation Case

Income Tax Appeal Allowed for Dr. Willmar Schwabe India in Amalgamation Case

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, delivered a landmark judgment on March 17, 2023, in the case involving Dr. Willmar Schwabe India Pvt Ltd, an amalgamated company of Sanat Products Limited, and the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Ghaziabad, concerning the assessment year 2017-18. The appeal, bearing case number ITA 1101/DEL/2022, was meticulously analyzed and eventually allowed in favor of the appellant, setting a precedent on handling cases involving amalgamated entities under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Background of the Case

Dr. Willmar Schwabe India Pvt Ltd, headquartered in New Delhi, found itself at the center of a legal battle against the erroneous order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act by the PCIT, Ghaziabad. The crux of the issue revolved around the legality and validity of proceedings against Sanat Products Limited, which ceased to exist following its amalgamation with Dr. Willmar Schwabe India Pvt Ltd, effective from September 1, 2021.

The Tribunal’s Examination and Findings

The tribunal, led by esteemed members Shri N.K. Billaiya, Accountant Member, and Shri Anubhav Sharma, Judicial Member, conducted a thorough examination of the case. Key points from the hearing included:

  • The appellant’s grievance against the order passed under Section 263 as erroneous and bad in law.
  • The disregard by the Ld. PCIT for the fact that Sanat Products Limited had been amalgamated, thereby rendering it a non-existent entity at the time of the order.
  • Reliance placed on various judicial precedents, including the landmark ruling by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Maruti Suzuki India Limited, which emphasized that orders passed in the name of non-existent entities are void ab initio.

Deliberations also touched upon the mandatory conditions as per Section 263 of the Act, highlighting a significant oversight by the Ld. PCIT in disregarding substantial evidence of the amalgamation presented by the assessee.

Final Judgment and its Implications

In a decisive verdict, the ITAT quashed the revisionary order passed by the PCIT, Ghaziabad, declaring it null and void as it was in the name of a non-existing company. The assessment order dated December 21, 2019, framed under Section 143(3) of the Act, was restored, marking a significant victory for Dr. Willmar Schwabe India Pvt Ltd.

This judgment underscores the importance of acknowledging corporate restructuring events, such as amalgamations, in the context of income tax assessments. It sets a robust precedent for the handling of similar cases in the future, ensuring that amalgamated entities are not wrongfully targeted in legal proceedings.

Conclusion

The favorable outcome for Dr. Willmar Schwabe India Pvt Ltd in ITA No. 1101/DEL/2022 serves as a critical reference point for taxation and legal professionals. It reinforces the principle that legal proceedings must align with current corporate structures and realities, signaling a step forward in jurisprudence related to income taxes and corporate amalgamations.


Income Tax Appeal Allowed for Dr. Willmar Schwabe India in Amalgamation Case

Team Clearlaw

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Categories

  • Income Tax

Recent Post’s

  • Inder Parstah Charitable Trust vs CIT (E), Chandigarh: Registration Denial Under Section 12AA and 80G
  • Babu Lal, Faridabad vs. ITO Ward-1(2), Faridabad: Case Filed for 2010-11 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
  • Ram Kumar Dhiamn vs. ITO Ward-26(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Due to Duplicate Filing
  • Saju Kozhikkadan Paul vs. ITO Ward-53(5), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Dismissed Due to Invalid Return
  • Naresh Kumar Jain vs. ITO Ward-47(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2011-12 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Research Platform
clearlaw footer logo

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform.

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Signup
  • Blog
  • Pricing

Search By

  • Appelent
  • Judge Name
  • Lawyer Name
  • Respondent

Legal

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy

Contact Us

  • Clearlaw
  • 9876543210
  • B-78 Noida Sector 60

Copyright © Clearlaw All Rights Reserved.

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy