This article discusses the case of Gopendra Kumar Garg, who resolved his tax disputes for the assessment year 2014-15 under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, highlighting the strategic implications for taxpayers and the revenue authority.
Gopendra Kumar Garg filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A)-13, New Delhi. However, during proceedings, he expressed his intention to settle the dispute through the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, leading to the withdrawal of his appeal.
The appeal was withdrawn based on Garg’s decision to opt into the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, which is designed to reduce litigation and provide a clear pathway to tax dispute resolution.
The case serves as a prime example of how the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme can be effectively utilized to resolve disputes, providing both taxpayers and the government a mechanism to settle conflicts efficiently and expediently.
The resolution of Gopendra Kumar Garg’s tax dispute through the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme demonstrates the practical benefits of this legislative approach to reducing pending litigation and fostering a cooperative relationship between taxpayers and tax authorities.
Gopendra Kumar Garg Resolves Tax Dispute Through Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform