Dismissal of Appeal in Case ITA 1185/DEL/2022 Concerning Misreported Income

In the case numbered ITA 1185/DEL/2022, the appellant, Raj Bir Singh from New Delhi, found his appeal against the Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward-3, Rohtak, dismissed by the Delhi Benches ‘F’ of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. This case, concerning the assessment year 2013-14, underscores significant aspects of the Indian tax assessment process, the scrutiny of declared income, and the substantive requirements for appeal processes. The presiding members, Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry (Judicial Member) and Shri Anil Chaturvedi (Accountant Member), delivered their judgment on January 4, 2023, closing a chapter on a contentious tax dispute.

Initially, Raj Bir Singh filed his return for the assessment year 2013-14 on February 6, 2014, reporting a total income of Rs. 2,02,550. The return attracted the department’s attention for scrutiny, leading to a re-assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This re-assessment concluded on March 14, 2016, substantially inflated Singh’s total income to Rs. 56,76,930. The massive upward revision was predicated on undisclosed cash deposits aggregating to Rs. 54,63,500 across various bank accounts, as revealed by Air Information reports received by the Assessing Officer (AO).

The dismissive stance towards Singh’s appeal by both the lower authority and the CIT(A) is deeply rooted in procedural lapses and substantial evidence inadequacies. Despite several opportunities provided, Singh failed to furnish any plausible explanation or documentary evidence to elucidate the source of the hefty deposits, leading to their classification as undisclosed income. This stance was systematically upheld through the appellate proceedings, culminating in the tribunal’s dismissal of the appeal.

…[Approximately 3,600 words abbreviated]…

The tribunal’s decision to dismiss Raj Bir Singh’s appeal reflects a stringent adherence to procedural regularity and the necessity for appellants to provide conclusive evidence supporting their claims. The judgment, enriching jurisprudential literature on tax law, highlights the pivotal role of comprehensive evidence and the repercussions of its absence in appeal mechanisms. The case, ITA 1185/DEL/2022, serves as a cautionary tale for taxpayers, underscoring the importance of maintaining transparent and well-documented financial records to withstand the scrutiny of tax assessment procedures.

Dismissal of Appeal in Case ITA 1185/DEL/2022 Concerning Misreported Income