Case Number: ITA No.6724/Del./2019
Assessment Year: 2011-12
Appellant: Dinesh Sharma, New Delhi
Respondent: Income Tax Officer, Ward 44(3), New Delhi
Result: Appeal allowed for statistical purposes; case remanded for rehearing.
Dinesh Sharma challenged the order of CIT(Appeals)-15, New Delhi, which dismissed his appeal on procedural grounds. The appeal related to assessments for the year 2011-12 and was initially heard without the presence of the appellant’s counsel due to their involvement in a GST audit.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘SMC’ Bench, Delhi, presided over by Shri Bhavnesh Saini, Judicial Member, heard the appeal. During the proceedings, it was brought to light that the appellant’s counsel had requested adjournments due to pre-scheduled commitments, which the CIT(A) declined, proceeding to decide the case in their absence.
Upon review, the Tribunal found that denying the adjournment request constituted a violation of the principles of natural justice. It was determined that the appellant was not given a fair opportunity to present his case, leading to the decision to set aside the CIT(A)’s order and remand the case for a fresh assessment.
The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to conduct a new hearing, ensuring that the appellant receives a reasonable opportunity to be heard, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural fairness in tax adjudication processes.
This case underscores the necessity for tax authorities to provide adequate hearing opportunities to taxpayers, particularly in cases involving significant procedural or substantive claims. The Tribunal’s insistence on re-hearing the case highlights the judiciary’s role in upholding the principles of natural justice and ensuring fair treatment in the administration of tax laws.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform