clearlaw logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Pricing
  • Blog
Login Get Started for Free
  1. Blog » CJ DARCL Logistics Ltd. vs. ACIT CPC-TDS: Appeal Withdrawn – ITA 6123/DEL/2019

CJ DARCL Logistics Ltd. vs. ACIT CPC-TDS: Appeal Withdrawn – ITA 6123/DEL/2019

Team Clearlaw  Team Clearlaw
Aug 14, 2024
Income Tax

Case Overview

The appeal by CJ DARCL Logistics Ltd. against the ACIT CPC-TDS, Ghaziabad for the assessment year 2015-16 was withdrawn by the appellant, as the issues in question were resolved, making the appeal infructuous.

Background

The appeal, originally filed due to disputes over tax deductions and treaty benefits, was aimed at addressing alleged errors by the ACIT in the application of tax deductions at higher rates under Section 206AA of the Income-tax Act, particularly concerning payments to a non-resident entity.

Resolution

Before the hearing, CJ DARCL Logistics Ltd. identified that the issues prompting the appeal were rectified through updates to the TRACES portal, leading to the resolution of disputes and clearing of any related demands for AY 2015-16. Consequently, the company formally requested the withdrawal of the appeal, stating that the grounds for the appeal no longer existed.

Tribunal’s Decision

The ITAT, upon receiving the withdrawal request and in absence of any objection from the Senior DR, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. This decision underscores the effectiveness of administrative rectifications in resolving tax disputes without further judicial proceedings.

Conclusion

This case highlights the importance of administrative mechanisms like the TRACES portal in the timely resolution of tax-related disputes, allowing for efficient closure of cases without prolonged litigation. The withdrawal of the appeal by CJ DARCL Logistics Ltd. serves as a precedent for similar cases, where rectifications achieved through system updates can obviate the need for judicial intervention.

CJ DARCL Logistics Ltd. vs. ACIT CPC-TDS: Appeal Withdrawn – ITA 6123/DEL/2019

Team Clearlaw

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Categories

  • Income Tax

Recent Post’s

  • Inder Parstah Charitable Trust vs CIT (E), Chandigarh: Registration Denial Under Section 12AA and 80G
  • Babu Lal, Faridabad vs. ITO Ward-1(2), Faridabad: Case Filed for 2010-11 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
  • Ram Kumar Dhiamn vs. ITO Ward-26(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Due to Duplicate Filing
  • Saju Kozhikkadan Paul vs. ITO Ward-53(5), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Dismissed Due to Invalid Return
  • Naresh Kumar Jain vs. ITO Ward-47(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2011-12 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Research Platform
clearlaw footer logo

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform.

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Signup
  • Blog
  • Pricing

Search By

  • Appelent
  • Judge Name
  • Lawyer Name
  • Respondent

Legal

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy

Contact Us

  • Clearlaw
  • 9876543210
  • B-78 Noida Sector 60

Copyright © Clearlaw All Rights Reserved.

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy