clearlaw logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Pricing
  • Blog
Login Get Started for Free
  1. Blog » Case Summary of Viksit Trading and Holding P. Ltd vs. ITO, Ward-26(3), New Delhi, ITA No. 6141/DEL/2019

Case Summary of Viksit Trading and Holding P. Ltd vs. ITO, Ward-26(3), New Delhi, ITA No. 6141/DEL/2019

Team Clearlaw  Team Clearlaw
Aug 14, 2024
Income Tax

Introduction

The case of Viksit Trading and Holding P. Ltd vs. ITO, Ward-26(3), New Delhi pertains to an appeal filed against the CIT(A)-9’s decision dated June 10, 2019, for the assessment year 2011-12. The appeal, however, was withdrawn by the appellant in favor of settling under the Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

Background

Viksit Trading and Holding P. Ltd filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A)-9 which was pertinent to discrepancies in their financial statements for the assessment year 2011-12. The case was scheduled for hearing on January 25, 2021, by which time the appellant decided to opt for a governmental amnesty scheme aimed at dispute resolution.

Details of the Appeal

The appellant, represented by none during the hearing, communicated through a letter the intention to withdraw the appeal. This decision was motivated by their participation in the Vivaad Se Vishwas Scheme, a legal framework designed to reduce litigation in direct taxes.

Decision of the Tribunal

The tribunal, presided over by Sh. N. K. Billaiya, Accountant Member, accepted the withdrawal of the appeal. However, it granted the liberty to the appellant to revive the appeal should there be a technical issue in settling the dispute under the scheme mentioned.

Conclusion

This case illustrates the procedural aspect of tax litigation where appellants opt for alternative dispute resolution mechanisms provided by the government to mitigate prolonged legal battles. The decision to withdraw highlights the strategic decisions companies may undertake to align with fiscal incentives offered by the legal system.

Case Summary of Viksit Trading and Holding P. Ltd vs. ITO, Ward-26(3), New Delhi, ITA No. 6141/DEL/2019

Team Clearlaw

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Categories

  • Income Tax

Recent Post’s

  • Inder Parstah Charitable Trust vs CIT (E), Chandigarh: Registration Denial Under Section 12AA and 80G
  • Babu Lal, Faridabad vs. ITO Ward-1(2), Faridabad: Case Filed for 2010-11 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
  • Ram Kumar Dhiamn vs. ITO Ward-26(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Due to Duplicate Filing
  • Saju Kozhikkadan Paul vs. ITO Ward-53(5), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Dismissed Due to Invalid Return
  • Naresh Kumar Jain vs. ITO Ward-47(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2011-12 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Research Platform
clearlaw footer logo

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform.

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Signup
  • Blog
  • Pricing

Search By

  • Appelent
  • Judge Name
  • Lawyer Name
  • Respondent

Legal

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy

Contact Us

  • Clearlaw
  • 9876543210
  • B-78 Noida Sector 60

Copyright © Clearlaw All Rights Reserved.

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy