clearlaw logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Pricing
  • Blog
Login Get Started for Free
  1. Blog » Bijender Singh Lochav vs ITO Ward 49(3), New Delhi: Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme for Assessment Year 2011-12

Bijender Singh Lochav vs ITO Ward 49(3), New Delhi: Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme for Assessment Year 2011-12

Team Clearlaw  Team Clearlaw
Aug 14, 2024
Income Tax

Bijender Singh Lochav vs ITO Ward 49(3), New Delhi: Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme for Assessment Year 2011-12

Case Number: ITA 6111/DEL/2019

Appellant: Bijender Singh Lochav, New Delhi

Respondent: ITO Ward 49(3), New Delhi

Assessment Year: 2011-12

Order Type: Final Tribunal Order

Date of Order: 29th June 2021

Case Filed On: 18th July 2019

Pronounced On: 29th June 2021

Background of the Case

Bijender Singh Lochav, a resident of New Delhi, filed an appeal against the Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 49(3), New Delhi, for the assessment year 2011-12. The appeal was filed under case number ITA 6111/DEL/2019, challenging the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-17 [CIT(A)], New Delhi, on 12th June 2019.

The appellant had initially contested the assessment order passed by the ITO, which had resulted in certain additions to his income. These additions were disputed, leading to the filing of the appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). However, before the tribunal could adjudicate the matter, a significant development led to the withdrawal of the appeal.

Grounds for Filing the Appeal

The appellant, Bijender Singh Lochav, had filed the appeal to challenge the assessment order that included contested additions made by the ITO. The appeal was grounded on the belief that the additions were unjustified and not in accordance with the law. The appellant sought relief from the tribunal to have the contested additions reversed.

During the pendency of the appeal, the Government of India introduced the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, a tax dispute resolution scheme aimed at reducing pending litigation. The scheme allowed taxpayers to settle their disputes by paying a specified amount of the disputed tax and receiving immunity from interest, penalties, and prosecution.

Tribunal Proceedings

The case was listed for hearing before the Delhi Bench ‘C’ of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on 29th June 2021. The bench was presided over by Vice President Shri G.S. Pannu and Judicial Member Ms. Madhumita Roy. The appellant did not appear for the hearing, but the tribunal considered a letter submitted by the appellant’s counsel on 16th June 2021, indicating the appellant’s decision to withdraw the appeal under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

The appellant’s counsel informed the tribunal that the appellant had opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and that a certificate under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, had already been issued in favor of the appellant. Given this development, the appellant requested the withdrawal of the appeal.

Final Tribunal Order

In light of the information provided by the appellant’s counsel, the tribunal granted permission for the appeal to be withdrawn. The tribunal noted that since the dispute had been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, there was no need for further adjudication on the merits of the case.

Accordingly, the tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, bringing the matter to a close. The tribunal’s order was pronounced on 29th June 2021.

Conclusion

The case of Bijender Singh Lochav vs ITO Ward 49(3), New Delhi, illustrates the successful application of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme in resolving pending tax disputes. By opting for this scheme, the appellant was able to settle the dispute efficiently and avoid prolonged litigation. The tribunal’s decision to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn reflects the effectiveness of the scheme in reducing the backlog of tax-related cases.

This case serves as a reference point for taxpayers considering the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme as a viable option for settling disputes. It underscores the benefits of opting for such alternative dispute resolution mechanisms introduced by the government to foster a more cooperative and less contentious tax environment.

Note: The above summary provides an overview of the tribunal proceedings and the final order in the case of Bijender Singh Lochav. For a more detailed understanding, interested parties are encouraged to refer to the full text of the tribunal’s order dated 29th June 2021.

Sd/-
(G.S. PANNU)
VICE PRESIDENT

Sd/-
(MADHUMITA ROY)
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Assistant Registrar

Bijender Singh Lochav vs ITO Ward 49(3), New Delhi: Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme for Assessment Year 2011-12

Team Clearlaw

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Categories

  • Income Tax

Recent Post’s

  • Inder Parstah Charitable Trust vs CIT (E), Chandigarh: Registration Denial Under Section 12AA and 80G
  • Babu Lal, Faridabad vs. ITO Ward-1(2), Faridabad: Case Filed for 2010-11 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
  • Ram Kumar Dhiamn vs. ITO Ward-26(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Due to Duplicate Filing
  • Saju Kozhikkadan Paul vs. ITO Ward-53(5), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Dismissed Due to Invalid Return
  • Naresh Kumar Jain vs. ITO Ward-47(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2011-12 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Research Platform
clearlaw footer logo

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform.

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Signup
  • Blog
  • Pricing

Search By

  • Appelent
  • Judge Name
  • Lawyer Name
  • Respondent

Legal

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy

Contact Us

  • Clearlaw
  • 9876543210
  • B-78 Noida Sector 60

Copyright © Clearlaw All Rights Reserved.

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy