The appeal case ITA No. 1496/Del/2022 serves as a significant judgment in the realm of income tax laws, particularly focusing on the issues surrounding the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (the Rules), and the implications of advances to subsidiary companies. This document presents a comprehensive analysis of the case between Beltek Canadian Waters Ltd., the appellant, and the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-4(2), Delhi, the respondent, for the assessment year 2017-18.
The heart of this appeal lies in the disallowance made under section 14A of the Act, as well as the controversy over the advances made by Beltek Canadian Waters Ltd. to one of its subsidiaries, M/s Accomplish Electronics Pvt. Ltd. It highlights the complexities and interpretations of the law relating to expenses incurred in relation to income that does not form part of the total income under the Act.
Background of the case begins with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi Bench, presided by Sh. C. M. Garg, Judicial Member, and Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member. The tribunal examined the case closely and pronounced its judgment in favor of the appellant, deciding on two major issues pointed out in their appeal.
The first issue dealt with the disallowance under section 14A. The appellant argued that the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals (CIT-A) unjustly confirmed the addition of Rs. 3,00,756/- made under section 14A, failing to acknowledge that no exempt income was received or declared during the year. Consequently, no expenses could be attributed to earning such income, rendering the disallowance unjustified.
The appellant brought into light several judicial precedents supporting their claim, along with mentioning the amendment to section 14A by the Finance Act, 2022, which became effective from 01.04.2022, i.e., assessment year 2022-23.
The second issue revolved around the addition of Rs. 22,69,198 made under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act. The bone of contention was whether there existed a direct nexus between the borrowed funds and the advances made by the appellant to its subsidiary company. The appellant argued that these advances were made out of interest-free funds available with them, thereby negating any disallowance of interest.
Judicial precedents from the Hon’ble Supreme Court were cited to fortify the appellant’s position regarding the advances made.
In addressing the first issue, the tribunal unequivocally stated that since the assessee had neither earned nor claimed any exempt income during the year in question, no disallowance under section 14A was warranted. This decisive ruling underscored the principle that in the absence of any income being exempt, associated expenses cannot be disallowed.
As for the second issue concerning advances to the subsidiary, the tribunal analyzed the appellant’s financials and concluded that the assessee had sufficient interest-free funds to cover the advances made. The tribunal, therefore, found no basis for the disallowance on the interest and ruled in favor of the appellant.
The decision of the ITAT in allowing the appeal of Beltek Canadian Waters Ltd. sets a precedent in the treatment of disallowances under section 14A and the consideration of advances to subsidiaries. This judgment not only provides clarity on these matters but also ensures that the principles of natural justice and fair play are duly upheld.
Order pronounced in the open court on 16/02/2023 marked a significant victory for Beltek Canadian Waters Ltd. and established critical legal benchmarks for similar cases in the future.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform