This detailed case summary involves Avonmore Capital & Management Services Ltd, which challenged the income tax assessment for the year 2014-15 against the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (DCIT), Circle-3(2), New Delhi. The case number ITA No. 4820/DEL/2019 was heard by the Delhi ‘SMC’ Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
The appeal was lodged against the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals] – I, New Delhi’s decision dated March 29, 2019. The core issue revolved around the disallowance made under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and its implications for computing book profit under section 115JB of the Act.
The tribunal’s session was held via video conference on September 15, 2021, under the stewardship of Shri N.K. Billaiya, Accountant Member. During the proceedings, both parties presented their arguments concerning the additions made by the Assessing Officer due to the application of Section 14A for MAT (Minimum Alternate Tax) calculations.
The Assessing Officer initially added Rs. 22,48,459 to the book profit under the MAT provisions after noticing that the assessee had added this sum under normal provisions of the Act but omitted it in the MAT calculation. This decision was rectified under Section 154 on the grounds of apparent mistake.
The appellant contended that the disallowance under Section 14A should not impact the MAT computation, supporting their argument with a tribunal decision from the Special Bench case of Vireet Investment.
The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer’s decision, leading to the appellant’s further challenge at the ITAT.
The ITAT member, Shri N.K. Billaiya, analyzed the submissions and the legal framework, particularly the implications of the Special Bench decision in Vireet Investment, which clarified that disallowances under Section 14A are not applicable for MAT computation under clause (f) of Explanation 1 to Section 115JB(2). Based on these findings, the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance made from the computation of book profit for MAT purposes.
The tribunal’s decision allowed the appeal of Avonmore Capital & Management Services Ltd, setting a significant precedent on how disallowances under Section 14A interact with MAT provisions. The case highlights the tribunal’s role in interpreting tax laws and providing clarity on complex tax disputes.
Avonmore Capital & Management Services Ltd vs DCIT Circle-3(2), New Delhi: Case Summary
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform