Introduction The case of Supriya Arya vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), Central Circle-25, New Delhi, revolves around the resolution of a tax dispute for the assessment year 2014-15. This case, filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), highlights the application of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, which was introduced by the […]
Introduction The case of Supriya Arya vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), Central Circle-25, New Delhi, pertains to a tax dispute for the assessment year 2015-16. Supriya Arya, a resident of New Delhi, faced tax assessments and demands from the ACIT, which she contested by filing an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal […]
Introduction The case of Galaxy Instruments Pvt. Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), Central Circle-25, New Delhi, pertains to a significant dispute concerning the assessment year 2017-18. The appellant, Galaxy Instruments Pvt. Ltd., a company based in Faridabad, Delhi, challenged the assessment order passed by the ACIT, which led to an appeal before […]
Introduction The tax dispute involving Pawan Arya and the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), Central Circle-25, New Delhi for the assessment year 2014-15 highlights a significant resolution process under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the case, the issues at hand, and the implications of the resolution. Case […]
Introduction The case of Aditya Arya vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), Central Circle-25, New Delhi pertains to the assessment year 2014-15. The appellant, Aditya Arya, sought to challenge the tax assessment made by the ACIT, which led to the filing of an appeal. However, the dispute was ultimately resolved under the Vivad Se […]
Introduction The case of Savita Rani Arya vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), Central Circle-25, New Delhi covers the assessment year 2014-15. This article delves into the dispute details, the legal arguments presented, and the resolution under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Case Background Savita Rani Arya filed an appeal against the order of […]
Introduction The case of Maneesh Kansal vs. ITO Ward-1(4), Ghaziabad pertains to the assessment year 2009-10, reflecting significant aspects of tax litigation and procedural nuances in Indian tax law. This analysis explores the sequence of events, arguments presented, and the tribunal’s decision. Background Maneesh Kansal appealed against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – Ghaziabad’s […]
Introduction The tribunal case of Savita Singh vs. ITO Ward-3(2), Bulandshahr addresses significant tax dispute issues for the assessment year 2010-11, focusing on legal challenges in tax assessments and procedural fairness. Background Savita Singh, representing her late father Shri Mahipal Singh, faced an income tax assessment for undeclared cash deposits in her bank account. This […]
Case Summary The case between Praveen Tayal (HUF) and the Income Tax Officer, Ward-55(1), New Delhi, pertains to a tax dispute for the assessment year 2014-15, which was resolved through the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Background Praveen Tayal (HUF) filed an appeal against the order of CIT(A)-37, New Delhi dated 28.06.2019. This appeal was related […]
Case Summary This case involves Omaks Electronics, a New Delhi-based entity, and the Income Tax Officer, Ward-44(3), New Delhi, focusing on the assessment year 2013-14. The primary issue at hand is the imposition of a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the alleged concealment of income by furnishing inaccurate […]
Case Summary The case of Ram Kishan Bindal, a proprietor of M/s. Bindal Trading Co. in Faridabad, against the Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(2), Faridabad, revolves around the assessment year 2011-12. The central issue is the alleged bogus purchases amounting to Rs.1,74,97,450/- and the validity of reopening the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax […]
Introduction The case between Rohit Gupta, proprietor of M/s Rohit Traders, and the Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward-2(2), Faridabad, pertains to the assessment year 2011-12. The case was notably settled under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act 2020, showcasing a strategic move towards resolving disputes without protracted litigation. Case Background Rohit Gupta filed an […]
Introduction The case between Shiksha Bharti Shiksha Samiti and the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), Circle Rewari, pertains to the assessment year 2011-12. This dispute was notably settled under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act 2020, a scheme introduced by the government to reduce litigation and resolve tax disputes amicably. Background of the […]
Introduction This case involves an appeal by Kartikay Nayyar against a penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer for non-compliance during the assessment year 2011-12. The penalty was challenged on the grounds that the appellant had indeed complied with the notices issued by the Income Tax Department. Case Background Kartikay Nayyar, represented by advocate Anil Kumar […]
Introduction This article covers the tribunal proceedings in the case of Kartikay Nayyar vs. ACIT Central Circle-20, New Delhi for the assessment year 2012-13. The case involves a penalty of Rs. 10,000 imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for alleged non-compliance with notices issued by the Assessing Officer (AO). The decision, […]
Case Overview: Kartikay Nayyar vs. ACIT, Assessment Year 2013-14 The case of Kartikay Nayyar vs. ACIT Central Circle-20, New Delhi, concerning the assessment year 2013-14, revolves around the imposition of a penalty of Rs. 10,000 under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty was imposed by the Assessing Officer (AO) for alleged […]
Case Overview: Kartikay Nayyar vs. ACIT, Assessment Year 2014-15 The case of Kartikay Nayyar vs. ACIT Central Circle-20, New Delhi, pertaining to the assessment year 2014-15, addresses the imposition of a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The penalty of Rs. 10,000 was imposed by the Assessing Officer (AO) for what […]
Case Overview: Kartikay Nayyar vs. ACIT, Assessment Year 2015-16 The case of Kartikay Nayyar vs. ACIT Central Circle-20, New Delhi, concerning the assessment year 2015-16, revolves around the imposition of a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This penalty, amounting to Rs. 10,000, was levied by the Assessing Officer (AO) due […]
Case Overview: Kartikay Nayyar vs. ACIT, Assessment Year 2016-17 The case of Kartikay Nayyar vs. ACIT Central Circle-20, New Delhi, pertaining to the assessment year 2016-17, revolves around the imposition of a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This penalty was imposed due to the alleged non-compliance by the appellant with […]
Case Overview: Rudraksh Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, Assessment Year 2011-12 The case of Rudraksh Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO Ward-21(4), New Delhi, related to the assessment year 2011-12, came up for hearing before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi Bench. The appeal was filed by Rudraksh Buildwell Private Limited against the order passed […]
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform