In a notable judgment by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘SMC’, the case of ITA No.1363/Del/2022 for the assessment year 2018-19 was brought into the spotlight. This case, involving appellant Sh. Mukesh Mittal against the Income Tax Officer, Ward-55(1), Delhi, delves deep into the complexities of income tax law and its application on individual taxpayers.
The appellant, Mukesh Mittal, a resident individual of 63, Ram Vihar, New Delhi, found himself contesting adjustments made by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, on his return of income for the assessment year 2018-19. The return, originally filed on 22nd September 2018, declared an income of Rs.8,87,707/-.
The Centralized Processing Centre (CPC), Bangalore, while processing Mittal’s return under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, made certain adjustments. These included the addition of PPF Interest of Rs.61,340/-, dividend receipts of Rs.63,105/-, and profits from M/s. MM Enterprises of Rs.4,27,875/-.
Challenging the adjustments, Mittal filed an appeal after his application under section 154 of the Act for rectification of mistakes was rejected. His appeal highlighted errors in the addition of exempt income and the double addition of business income already declared.
The Tribunal, led by Shri Saktijit Dey, Judicial Member, heard the arguments. The appellant’s counsel pointed out the misinterpretation of income categories and wrongful additions. Notably, the profits from M/s. MM Enterprises were taxed separately, making their addition to the assessed income incorrect. Similarly, PPF interest and dividend income, being exempt, were erroneously added back.
After a thorough review, the Tribunal directed the deletion of these additions, thereby allowing the appeal in favor of Mittal. This decision not only rectified the misinterpretations by the lower authorities but also set a precedent on how exempt income and declared business income should be treated.
The case of ITA No.1363/DEL/2022 stands as a critical example of the appellate process in rectifying assessment orders. It underscores the importance of understanding the nuanced distinctions between income categories under the Income-tax Act, 1961. For Mukesh Mittal, the Tribunal’s ruling provided much-needed relief and reinforced the principles of fairness and accuracy in tax assessments.
Order pronounced in the open court on 25th August 2022, delivering a comprehensive judgment on the contested income tax adjustments, ultimately allowing the appeal and setting a remarkable legal precedent.
Appeal Against Order in ITA No.1363/DEL/2022 for AY 2018-19: A Case Study
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform