Case Number: ITA 4924/DEL/2019
Appellant: Ankit Saraf, New Delhi
Respondent: ITO WARD- 51(5), New Delhi
Assessment Year: 2014-15
Case Filed On: 2019-05-30
Order Type: Final Tribunal Order
Date of Order: 2021-03-03
Pronounced On: 2021-03-03
This case involves the appeal filed by Ankit Saraf, New Delhi (appellant) against the Income Tax Officer, Ward-51(5), New Delhi (respondent). The dispute pertains to the assessment year 2014-15 and was settled under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The appellant filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-17, New Delhi, dated April 12, 2019. The case was brought before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi “D” Bench, through video conferencing.
During the virtual hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the assessee submitted a letter dated February 26, 2021, requesting withdrawal of the appeal. The letter, received via email, stated that the assessee had opted to settle the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, confirming the settlement, was also filed.
The Tribunal, comprising Shri G.S. Pannu, Vice President, and Shri Kul Bharat, Judicial Member, considered the request for withdrawal. The Senior Departmental Representative, Shri M. Baranwal, had no objections to the withdrawal.
Based on the submissions, the Tribunal accepted the request for withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. The order was pronounced on March 3, 2021, at the conclusion of the virtual hearing.
Order Pronounced: March 3, 2021
By:
Shri G.S. Pannu, Vice President
Shri Kul Bharat, Judicial Member
Copy forwarded to:
Assistant Registrar
Ankit Saraf vs ITO Ward-51(5) – ITA 4924/DEL/2019: Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform