clearlaw logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Pricing
  • Blog
Login Get Started for Free
  1. Blog » Analysis of Tribunal Decision on Penalty Appeal by Mritunjay Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2015-16

Analysis of Tribunal Decision on Penalty Appeal by Mritunjay Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2015-16

Team Clearlaw  Team Clearlaw
Aug 14, 2024
Income Tax

Introduction

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi Bench ‘E’ delivered a decision on the appeal filed by Mritunjay Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. against the Income Tax Officer, Ward-17(2), New Delhi concerning penalties imposed for the assessment year 2015-16.

Background

Mritunjay Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., a company based in New Delhi, appealed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) which confirmed the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer. The case focuses on penalties related to alleged discrepancies in income declarations for the year.

Case Details

The appellant argued that the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) was erroneous and lacked proper judicial examination, particularly since the underlying quantum addition of Rs. 70,39,198 was still under appeal. The appellant contended that the penalty was unjust as it was based on an assessment order that itself was under judicial review.

Tribunal Proceedings

Detailed proceedings in the tribunal highlighted procedural inadequacies in how the appeals were handled. Specifically, the appellant was not given a fair opportunity to present its case at the CIT(A) level, which led to an ex-parte decision.

Judgment

The tribunal, after reviewing the submissions and the circumstances, directed the CIT(A) to issue a fresh order. This decision was to ensure that the appellant’s objections to the quantum additions were addressed before finalizing the penalty.

Conclusion

The ITAT’s directive for a denovo consideration by the CIT(A) underscores the importance of procedural fairness in tax adjudications. This case serves as a pertinent example of how appellate tribunals handle cases where initial appellate proceedings may have deficiencies.

The decision, pronounced on November 22, 2022, by Judicial Member Shri Saktijit Dey and Accountant Member Shri Anadee Nath Misshra, reflects a commitment to ensuring justice through proper legal channels.

Analysis of Tribunal Decision on Penalty Appeal by Mritunjay Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. for AY 2015-16

Team Clearlaw

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Categories

  • Income Tax

Recent Post’s

  • Inder Parstah Charitable Trust vs CIT (E), Chandigarh: Registration Denial Under Section 12AA and 80G
  • Babu Lal, Faridabad vs. ITO Ward-1(2), Faridabad: Case Filed for 2010-11 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
  • Ram Kumar Dhiamn vs. ITO Ward-26(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Due to Duplicate Filing
  • Saju Kozhikkadan Paul vs. ITO Ward-53(5), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Dismissed Due to Invalid Return
  • Naresh Kumar Jain vs. ITO Ward-47(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2011-12 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Research Platform
clearlaw footer logo

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform.

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Signup
  • Blog
  • Pricing

Search By

  • Appelent
  • Judge Name
  • Lawyer Name
  • Respondent

Legal

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy

Contact Us

  • Clearlaw
  • 9876543210
  • B-78 Noida Sector 60

Copyright © Clearlaw All Rights Reserved.

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy