clearlaw logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Pricing
  • Blog
Login Get Started for Free
  1. Blog » Analysis of Golden Century Food Products P. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward 10(2), New Delhi for AY 2011-12

Analysis of Golden Century Food Products P. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward 10(2), New Delhi for AY 2011-12

Team Clearlaw  Team Clearlaw
Aug 14, 2024
Income Tax

Case Overview

This article reviews the tribunal decision in ITA No. 6137/DEL/2019 where Golden Century Food Products P. Ltd. faced reassessment for the assessment year 2011-12 based on allegations of accommodation entries.

Background

The case originated from information suggesting that Golden Century had taken accommodation entries amounting to Rs. 15,00,000. This led to a reassessment by the Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward-10(2), New Delhi.

Proceedings and Allegations

The ITO received information regarding alleged accommodation entries, which prompted a reassessment notice. The case highlights key issues surrounding the notice’s validity and the merits of the reassessment, particularly whether the initial reasons for reassessment had factual substance.

Tribunal’s Analysis

The tribunal scrutinized the legality of the reassessment initiated by the ITO. The judgment focused on the procedural aspects, such as the adequacy of the reasons to believe, the linking of the alleged accommodation entry to the assessee, and the addressing of the assessee’s objections.

Key Findings

The tribunal found discrepancies in the reasons cited for reassessment, notably the mismatch in the company’s details and the nature of the alleged transactions. Additionally, the tribunal criticized the lack of proper response to the objections raised by the assessee and the speculative nature of the additions made to the assessee’s income.

Decision

The tribunal decided in favor of the assessee, highlighting the need for precision and factual accuracy in reassessment proceedings. It emphasized that reassessments based on incorrect facts or unresolved objections are unsustainable.

Implications

This case serves as a critical reference for understanding the boundaries of tax authority in reassessment cases and emphasizes the importance of procedural correctness and factual clarity in tax proceedings.

Conclusion

The decision in Golden Century Food Products P. Ltd. vs. ITO marks a significant point in tax jurisprudence, underlining the principles of justice and detailed scrutiny in handling tax reassessment cases, particularly those involving allegations of accommodation entries.

Analysis of Golden Century Food Products P. Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward 10(2), New Delhi for AY 2011-12

Team Clearlaw

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Categories

  • Income Tax

Recent Post’s

  • Inder Parstah Charitable Trust vs CIT (E), Chandigarh: Registration Denial Under Section 12AA and 80G
  • Babu Lal, Faridabad vs. ITO Ward-1(2), Faridabad: Case Filed for 2010-11 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
  • Ram Kumar Dhiamn vs. ITO Ward-26(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Due to Duplicate Filing
  • Saju Kozhikkadan Paul vs. ITO Ward-53(5), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Dismissed Due to Invalid Return
  • Naresh Kumar Jain vs. ITO Ward-47(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2011-12 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Research Platform
clearlaw footer logo

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform.

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Signup
  • Blog
  • Pricing

Search By

  • Appelent
  • Judge Name
  • Lawyer Name
  • Respondent

Legal

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy

Contact Us

  • Clearlaw
  • 9876543210
  • B-78 Noida Sector 60

Copyright © Clearlaw All Rights Reserved.

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy