The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi Bench ‘E’ recently adjudicated the case of ACIT, Circle-17(2), New Delhi against MNF Metal & Forming Pvt Ltd, New Delhi, with ITA No. 6473/DEL/2019. The appeal was related to the assessment year 2013-14 and was filed on August 2, 2019. The final order was pronounced on September 30, 2019.
This case revolved around the appeal filed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT) against the respondent, MNF Metal & Forming Pvt Ltd. The primary issue concerned the tax effect, which was below the monetary limit set by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) for filing appeals.
The appellant’s case faced scrutiny under the guidelines of the CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, issued on August 8, 2019. According to this circular, the CBDT increased the monetary thresholds for the tax effect in appeals filed before the ITAT, High Courts, and the Supreme Court. Specifically, the limit for appeals before the ITAT was raised to Rs. 50 lakhs.
This move by the CBDT was part of a broader strategy to reduce litigation and manage the pendency of cases, ensuring that only substantial matters were brought before higher courts. The circular emphasized that appeals should not be filed if the tax effect was below the prescribed limits unless the case involved certain exceptions like the constitutionality of a law, issues of public importance, or matters related to substantial risks for the revenue.
During the hearing, the representative of the respondent argued that the tax effect in this case was well below the Rs. 50 lakh threshold. Citing the recent CBDT circular, the representative contended that the appeal should not be maintained as per the new monetary limits.
On the other hand, the department’s representative (DR) argued that the circular should apply prospectively and not to pending appeals. However, the bench, comprising Shri H.S. Sidhu, Judicial Member, and Shri Prashant Maharishi, Accountant Member, disagreed with this contention.
The ITAT noted that the CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 was intended to apply to all pending appeals, as clarified in other cases and previous judgments. The tribunal observed that the monetary limit specified in the circular was binding on the Income Tax authorities and should be respected in the interest of judicial efficiency.
Given that the tax effect in this case was below Rs. 50 lakhs, the ITAT held that the appeal was not maintainable. The tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the department in line with the CBDT’s instructions. However, the tribunal also provided the department with the liberty to file a miscellaneous application if any exceptions outlined in the CBDT circular were later identified.
The case of ACIT vs MNF Metal & Forming Pvt Ltd underscores the importance of adhering to the monetary limits set by the CBDT for filing appeals. The ITAT’s dismissal of the department’s appeal due to the tax effect being below Rs. 50 lakhs reflects the tribunal’s commitment to reducing unnecessary litigation and ensuring that only significant cases are brought before the courts.
The decision highlights the relevance of CBDT’s efforts to streamline tax litigation and focus on more substantial matters. The judgment was pronounced in an open court on September 30, 2019, and both parties were duly informed of the outcome.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform