The ITAT New Delhi’s decision in the case of Rajeshwar Prashad Goel vs. DCIT, Panipat for the assessment year 2011-12 addresses issues of accounting and profit estimation in tax assessments. This case provides insights into how disputes regarding net profit calculations are handled in the judicial system.
Rajeshwar Prashad Goel filed a return declaring an income of Rs. 14,50,170 for AY 2011-12. The case was selected for scrutiny, leading to disputes over the declared profit and accounting methods used by Goel.
The appellant contested the CIT(A)’s decision which supported the Assessing Officer’s rejection of books of account and estimation of higher net profits. The main issues revolved around the rejection of books without specific defects and the arbitrary estimation of net profits.
The ITAT scrutinized the lack of specific reasons for rejecting the books of account and considered the historical gross profit ratios submitted by the appellant. The tribunal directed an adjustment in the net profit ratio to 1.5%, acknowledging the appellant’s past financial history and current submissions.
This decision underscores the necessity for the Assessing Officer to provide concrete reasons for rejecting books of account and calls for a reasoned approach in estimating profits. It also highlights the tribunal’s role in ensuring fair tax assessments by considering the entirety of an assessee’s financial history and circumstances.
Rajeshwar Prashad Goel vs. DCIT Panipat: A Dispute on Net Profit Estimation for AY 2011-12
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform