In a significant tax appeal case, ITA Nos. 756 & 757/Del/2022, corresponding to the assessment years 2017-18 & 2019-20, G.S. Developers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in civil construction, contested the income tax adjustments attributed by the Central Processing Centre (CPC), Bangalore. The primary contention revolved around the adjustments made under sections 143(1) pertaining to the profit on sale of fixed assets, service-tax, and the delayed deposit of PF and ESIC, leading to a determined total income of Rs.2,13,98,820 for the A.Y. 2017-18.
The appellant company’s grievances were initially addressed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, which dismissed the appeal, resulting in the company moving to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench.
The tribunal, led by accountant member Sh. Anil Chaturvedi and judicial member Sh. Chandra Mohan Garg, deliberated over the arguments presented by both sides. The focal point of the appeal was the alleged incorrect adjustments made by the CPC under section 143(1) without proper consideration of factual and legal standpoints, particularly concerning the delayed deposit of employee share of PF & ESI.
The respondent, ACIT Range-10, Delhi, supported by Senior D.R. Ms. Kirti Sankratyayan, argued on the basis of prevailing jurisprudence and income tax provisions that substantiated the adjustments made during the processing of the return. The pivotal reference was made to a Supreme Court decision in Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT, which set a precedent on the deductibility of employee contributions to PF & ESI if not deposited within specified timelines. The tribunal validated the legal standing cited by the respondent, thereby substantiating the legitimacy of the adjustments contested by G.S. Developers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd.
Despite the appellant’s efforts to contest the adjustments on various legal grounds, the tribunal found substantial legal backing for the adjustments made relating to the profit on sale of fixed assets, service-tax, and the delayed deposit of PF and ESI. The tribunal’s decision was influenced by precedents and the applicability of income tax laws, leading to the dismissal of the appeals for both A.Y. 2017-18 & 2019-20.
This case illustrates the intricate nature of tax litigation and the critical role of judicial precedents in determining the outcome of such appeals. It underscores the importance for companies to adhere strictly to tax laws and regulations, especially regarding the timely deposit of employee contributions to PF and ESI, to avoid unfavorable adjustments and potential legal challenges.
The dismissal of G.S Developers & Contractors Pvt. Ltd.’s appeal serves as a cautionary tale for corporations regarding the stringent interpretation and enforcement of tax laws by judicial bodies. It emphasizes the need for diligent tax planning, compliance, and documentation to withstand scrutiny from tax authorities and appellate tribunals.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform