The case of Rakesh Kumar, HUF against the ITO, Ward-43(4), New Delhi, pertains to the assessment year 2015-16. Originally filed on March 5, 2019, it was concluded on June 1, 2022, when the appellant decided to withdraw the appeal.
This case revolves around a tax dispute concerning assessment year 2015-16. The appeal was made against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-15, New Delhi, dated December 24, 2018. The key point of contention was addressed through the Direct Tax Vivad-se-Vishwas Act, 2020, a scheme introduced by the Government of India to settle pending disputes related to direct taxes.
The appeal process and subsequent withdrawal are significant as they highlight the legal frameworks and the effectiveness of the Vivad-se-Vishwas scheme in resolving tax disputes. The appellant, Rakesh Kumar HUF, initially contested the commissioner’s decision but later opted to withdraw the appeal after receiving a favorable order under the scheme, evidenced by Form No.5 issued by the designated authority on March 5, 2021.
The withdrawal of the appeal by Rakesh Kumar HUF under the Vivad-se-Vishwas Act demonstrates a successful application of this dispute resolution mechanism. This case serves as a precedent and offers insights into the strategic considerations involved in choosing to settle tax disputes through governmental schemes rather than prolonged litigation.
This case summary provides a comprehensive understanding of the legal processes, the application of specific tax resolution schemes, and the strategic decisions made by taxpayers in the context of Indian income tax laws.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform