This case review explores the withdrawal of the tax appeal filed by Renu Bansal for the assessment year 2015-16 against the Income Tax Officer, Ward-38(4), New Delhi. The case, filed under ITA No. 1335/DEL/2019, was withdrawn by the appellant in favor of resolving the issue under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
Renu Bansal initially filed a tax appeal questioning certain decisions made by the Income Tax Department. However, the appeal did not proceed to a detailed tribunal decision because the appellant elected to resolve the dispute through the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, designed to reduce litigation in direct tax matters.
The hearing was conducted via video conferencing on December 14, 2020. During the proceedings, Vice President G.S. Pannu and Judicial Member Amit Shukla presided over the case. Although the appellant was not present, her intent to withdraw the appeal was communicated through a submission stating her participation in the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The tribunal accepted Renu Bansal’s request to withdraw the appeal, reflecting the utility and effectiveness of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme in facilitating amicable dispute resolutions. This case demonstrates the government’s aim to minimize legal proceedings and encourage compliance through reconciliation.
The resolution of this case under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme underscores the potential for such initiatives to simplify tax governance and reduce the backlog of cases, possibly setting a benchmark for future disputes of similar nature.
The tribunal’s acceptance of the withdrawal request emphasizes the effectiveness of schemes like Vivad Se Vishwas in resolving tax disputes outside of prolonged judicial processes, thus highlighting its significance in the landscape of Indian tax litigation.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform