Date Filed: February 18, 2019
Assessment Year: 2015-16
Order Type: Final Tribunal Order
Date of Order: December 14, 2020
Pronounced On: December 14, 2020
The appeal by Anju Bansal, concerning tax adjustments for the assessment year 2015-16, was brought against the decision of CIT(A)-13, New Delhi dated January 29, 2019. The appeal was resolved through the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, aimed at reducing litigation by allowing tax dispute settlements.
Anju Bansal challenged the adjustments made to her tax liabilities, which led to the filing of this appeal. On the scheduled day of the virtual hearing, nobody appeared on her behalf, but a letter was submitted indicating her desire to withdraw the appeal and settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. This included a certificate under Section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, confirming the settlement.
The Departmental Representative had no objections to the withdrawal. The Tribunal, after reviewing the settlement documentation and considering the mutual consent for resolution, permitted the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, effectively resolving the tax dispute and closing the case.
The successful resolution of this case under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme highlights the benefits of the scheme in providing a clear and expedient path to tax dispute resolution, thereby reducing the burden on judicial resources and providing taxpayers with an efficient mechanism to settle disputes.
Vivad Se Vishwas Resolution: ITA 1342/DEL/2019 – Anju Bansal vs. ITO Ward 38(4), New Delhi
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform