This article presents a detailed review of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) decision in the case of Hardev Sahai Gupta vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-39(4), New Delhi for the assessment year 2015-16. The case (ITA No. 1264/DEL/2019) revolved around the scrutiny of claimed long term capital gains (LTCG) which were contested by the Income Tax Department as bogus transactions.
Hardev Sahai Gupta, the appellant, was implicated in transactions involving penny stocks, which were alleged by the IT department to be a means to introduce unaccounted money into the financial system. The IT department, leveraging a report from the Investigation Wing in Kolkata, suggested that the transactions were sham and manipulated to convert black money into white, thus evading taxes.
During the proceedings, the Assessing Officer (AO) challenged the genuineness of the transactions, leading to a denial of the LTCG exemption under section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act. The AO’s decision was primarily based on the investigation report which identified a pattern of bogus capital gain entries being facilitated by certain brokers.
The appellant contested these findings and provided evidence including bank statements and demat account details to substantiate the legitimacy of the transactions. Despite this, the AO added the sum of Rs. 44,65,717 to the appellant’s income under section 68 of the IT Act, considering it an unexplained cash credit.
The tribunal examined the substantial evidences and arguments presented. It noted significant procedural lapses on the part of the AO, particularly the failure to conduct an independent inquiry beyond the investigation report. The ITAT highlighted that the AO relied excessively on pre-existing statements and did not corroborate these during the assessment proceedings.
After evaluating the materials submitted by the appellant, the ITAT ruled in favor of the taxpayer, directing the AO to accept the declared long term capital gains. The tribunal’s decision emphasized the importance of conducting thorough and independent verification in tax assessments.
This case underscores the critical oversight functions of the ITAT in ensuring that tax assessments are fair and just, particularly when accusations of bogus transactions are involved. It also illustrates the necessity for taxpayers to maintain robust documentation to support their claims, which can be pivotal in disputes.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform