This article provides an in-depth analysis of the tribunal proceedings of ITA No. 1109/DEL/2019, where the ACIT Central Circle, Moradabad, challenged the tax assessment of Anju Agarwal, Jaipur, for the assessment year 2016-17.
The case involves a tax assessment dispute between the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT) Central Circle, Moradabad, and Anju Agarwal from Jaipur. The dispute pertains to the assessment year 2016-17. The appellant, ACIT, filed the case on 12th February 2019, challenging the order passed by the lower authorities.
The case was presented before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench ‘Friday-A’, on 23rd August 2019, with the order being pronounced on 28th August 2019. The bench consisted of Shri H.S. Sidhu, Judicial Member, and Shri Anadee Nath Misshra, Accountant Member.
The primary grounds of appeal included:
The tribunal reviewed several appeals, including ITA No. 1109/DEL/2019. During the proceedings, it was noted that the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) had issued Circular No. 17/2019 dated 8th August 2019, which raised the monetary limit for filing departmental appeals to Rs. 50,00,000. This circular was intended to reduce litigation and manage pending appeals effectively.
‘At the outset, at the time of hearing before us, we referred to the recent CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, wherein the minimum threshold limit of tax effect for filing of appeals by Revenue in ITAT has been enhanced to Rs. 50,00,000.’
The tribunal noted that the tax effect in the present appeal was below the enhanced limit of Rs. 50,00,000, making the appeal non-maintainable under the new guidelines. Consequently, the Revenue’s appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal concluded that in light of the CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, the appeal filed by the Revenue did not meet the revised monetary threshold for maintainability. The tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the appellant to withdraw the appeal in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the CBDT.
The tribunal’s final judgment read as follows:
‘Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, the appeal filed by the Revenue is treated as withdrawn and is accordingly dismissed. The decision was pronounced in the open court on 28.08.2019.’
This judgment highlights the tribunal’s adherence to procedural fairness and the application of the CBDT’s directives aimed at reducing unnecessary litigation and expediting the resolution of tax disputes.
This case serves as a precedent for similar disputes, emphasizing the importance of adhering to updated procedural guidelines and monetary thresholds set by the CBDT. It also underscores the tribunal’s role in ensuring that tax disputes are resolved efficiently, with due consideration given to the principles of natural justice.
The following sections provide a detailed account of the tribunal’s deliberations and the legal arguments presented by both sides during the hearing of ITA No. 1109/DEL/2019.
Shri Anunav Kumar, representing the Revenue, and Shri Anup Mehta, representing Anju Agarwal, presented their respective cases before the tribunal. The appellant argued that the lower authorities had erred in their assessment, while the respondent’s counsel maintained that the assessment was conducted in accordance with the law.
The tribunal analyzed the implications of the CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, which aimed to reduce litigation by increasing the monetary threshold for filing appeals. The circular emphasized the need to manage the backlog of cases effectively, ensuring that only significant disputes reached higher appellate authorities.
‘The CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 aims to enhance the monetary limits for filing of appeals in income-tax cases, thereby reducing unnecessary litigation and managing pending cases more efficiently.’
The tribunal noted that the tax effect in the present appeal was below the revised threshold, rendering the appeal non-maintainable. This decision was consistent with the CBDT’s objective of minimizing frivolous litigation and focusing resources on more substantial disputes.
The tribunal’s decision in ITA No. 1109/DEL/2019 underscores the importance of adhering to updated guidelines and procedural norms in tax litigation. By dismissing the appeal based on the revised monetary threshold, the tribunal reinforced the principles of efficiency and fairness in the resolution of tax disputes.
The case serves as a significant reference point for future tax litigation, highlighting the need for appellants to consider the monetary limits and guidelines set forth by the CBDT before filing appeals. It also emphasizes the role of the ITAT in ensuring that tax disputes are resolved in a timely and just manner, in accordance with the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness.
Order pronounced in open court on this 28th day of August, 2019.
Per H.S. Sidhu, Judicial Member and Anadee Nath Misshra, Accountant Member.
Tax Dispute Resolution: ACIT Central Circle vs. Anju Agarwal – ITA No. 1109/DEL/2019
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform