This article provides an in-depth analysis of ITA No. 936/DEL/2019, where Rajendra Kumar Kedia withdrew his appeal against the assessment year 2015-16 decision under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. This case highlights the tax dispute resolution mechanisms available in India.
Rajendra Kumar Kedia filed an appeal against the decision of the CIT(A)-13, New Delhi regarding the assessment year 2015-16. The appeal was later withdrawn following the assessee’s decision to settle under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, aimed at reducing litigation in direct taxes.
The original appeal was driven by disputes over tax calculations for the assessment year in question. However, the introduction of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme provided a platform for Kedia to resolve his disputes amicably. This move underscores the effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution in tax matters.
The Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme was introduced to allow taxpayers to settle tax disputes out of court by paying a portion of the disputed amount. This scheme has significantly reduced ongoing litigations and encouraged compliance.
Kedia’s decision to withdraw his appeal and opt for the scheme illustrates the growing acceptance of such government initiatives among taxpayers. It also sets a precedent for other taxpayers who are contemplating similar resolutions.
This case provides insight into the practical application of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and its impact on reducing the backlog of cases in the Indian judicial system. Rajendra Kumar Kedia’s case serves as an important example of the evolving nature of tax litigation and resolution in India.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform