The case of Kirpa Shankar versus ITO for the assessment year 2005-06 presents a significant instance of tax dispute resolution facilitated by the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme introduced by the Indian government in 2020. This case study explores the proceedings and outcomes of the appeal filed by Kirpa Shankar, leading to his decision to withdraw the appeal and settle under the scheme.
Initially filed against the order of CIT(A)-32, New Delhi, the case detailed the assessment disputes for the year 2005-06. During the proceedings, conducted via video conferencing due to the pandemic, Kirpa Shankar opted to withdraw his appeal and settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. This move underscores the scheme’s objective to reduce pending income tax litigation and provide a straightforward path to dispute resolution.
The withdrawal signifies a shift towards alternative dispute resolutions in tax matters, offering a closer look at how taxpayers and authorities can reach amicable resolutions. The decision was accepted by the tribunal, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, setting a precedent for similar cases.
This detailed article aims to provide insights into the mechanics of the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and its practical application in resolving longstanding disputes, thereby promoting a more compliant and less adversarial tax environment.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform