clearlaw logo
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Pricing
  • Blog
Login Get Started for Free
  1. Blog » Detailed Analysis of ITA No. 289/DEL/2019: Adit Infratel Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO, Ward-1(3), New Delhi

Detailed Analysis of ITA No. 289/DEL/2019: Adit Infratel Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO, Ward-1(3), New Delhi

Team Clearlaw  Team Clearlaw
Jul 01, 2024
Income Tax

Comprehensive Case Study: ITA No. 289/DEL/2019

Introduction

This case study explores the decision in ITA No. 289/DEL/2019 where Adit Infratel Pvt. Ltd. faced a denial of deductions under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act, which was subsequently challenged in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).

Background

The case revolves around the denial of a substantial deduction claimed by Adit Infratel Pvt. Ltd. under section 80IC for the assessment year 2014-15. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied the deduction based on non-compliance with certain conditions stipulated for the deductions under this section.

Legal Issues

The primary legal issue addressed was whether the activities carried out by Adit Infratel constituted ‘manufacturing’ and if the location of these activities fell within a designated ‘notified area’ as required for claiming deductions under section 80IC.

Arguments and Tribunal Decision

The tribunal examined previous years’ rulings and the specifics of the manufacturing processes claimed by Adit Infratel. The decision considered whether the assembly of cell phone batteries and other accessories by Adit Infratel met the criteria of manufacturing and whether the location qualified as a notified area for purposes of section 80IC.

Conclusion

The tribunal’s decision in favor of Adit Infratel highlighted the importance of precise documentation and compliance with statutory provisions to successfully claim tax deductions. This case serves as a significant precedent for similar cases involving section 80IC deductions.

Detailed Analysis of ITA No. 289/DEL/2019: Adit Infratel Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO, Ward-1(3), New Delhi

Team Clearlaw

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Categories

  • Income Tax

Recent Post’s

  • Inder Parstah Charitable Trust vs CIT (E), Chandigarh: Registration Denial Under Section 12AA and 80G
  • Babu Lal, Faridabad vs. ITO Ward-1(2), Faridabad: Case Filed for 2010-11 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme
  • Ram Kumar Dhiamn vs. ITO Ward-26(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Due to Duplicate Filing
  • Saju Kozhikkadan Paul vs. ITO Ward-53(5), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2015-16 Assessment Year – Appeal Dismissed Due to Invalid Return
  • Naresh Kumar Jain vs. ITO Ward-47(4), New Delhi: Case Filed for 2011-12 Assessment Year – Appeal Withdrawn Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.

Research Platform
clearlaw footer logo

Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform.

Quick Links

  • About Us
  • Signup
  • Blog
  • Pricing

Search By

  • Appelent
  • Judge Name
  • Lawyer Name
  • Respondent

Legal

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund Policy

Contact Us

  • Clearlaw
  • 9876543210
  • B-78 Noida Sector 60

Copyright © Clearlaw All Rights Reserved.

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Refund Policy