Case Number: ITA 534/DEL/2019
Appellant: Tarun Kumar Saraf & Sons (HUF), Delhi
Respondent: ITO, Ward-48(2), New Delhi
Assessment Year: 2015-16
Result: 2015-16
Case Filed on: January 24, 2019
Order Type: Final Tribunal Order
Date of Order: December 18, 2020
Pronounced on: December 18, 2020
The appellant, Tarun Kumar Saraf & Sons (HUF), filed an appeal against the Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward-48(2), New Delhi, for the assessment year 2015-16. The case was filed on January 24, 2019, and sought resolution of tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The hearing was conducted via video conferencing due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The tribunal was presided over by Shri G.S. Pannu, Vice President, and Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava, Judicial Member.
Order:
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI FRIDAY BENCH ‘A’ : NEW DELHI
(Through Video Conferencing)
BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
ITA No. 534/Del/2019
Assessment Year: 2015-16
Tarun Kumar Saraf & Sons (HUF),
505 B & C, Katra Asharfi,
Chandni Chowk,
Delhi – 110 006.
PAN: AABHT6779G
Vs.
Income Tax Officer,
Ward-48(2), New Delhi.
(Appellant) (Respondent)
Appellant by: Shri Lalit Mohan, CA
Respondent by: Shri Jagdish Singh, Senior DR
Date of Hearing: 18.12.2020
Date of Pronouncement: 18.12.2020
PER G.S. PANNU, VP:
This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2015-16 is directed against the order of the learned CIT(A)-13, New Delhi, dated 10.12.2018.
The learned counsel for the assessee, vide email dated 14.12.2020, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.
Learned Senior DR has no objection.
In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 18th December, 2020.
Sd/- Sd/-
(SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA) (G.S. PANNU)
JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT
Copy forwarded to:
Assistant Registrar
The case, filed by Tarun Kumar Saraf & Sons (HUF) against the ITO, Ward-48(2), New Delhi, was concluded with the withdrawal of the appeal. This decision was made following the appellant’s choice to resolve the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The tribunal, comprising Vice President Shri G.S. Pannu and Judicial Member Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava, accepted the withdrawal request, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform