In a significant ruling dated January 21, 2022, by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench, the case between VRT Exports Pvt Ltd, Delhi, and the Assistant Director of Income Tax (CPC), Bangalore was decided. The case number ITA 1161/DEL/2021 pertains to the assessment year 2019-20 and revolves around the disallowance of deductions claimed by the appellant for the delayed payment of employee contributions to Provident Fund (PF) and Employees State Insurance (ESI).
The appellant, VRT Exports Pvt Ltd, is engaged in the manufacturing and export of garments. For the assessment year 2019-20, the company faced disallowances made by the Central Processing Centre (CPC), Bangalore, concerning the delayed contributions to PF and ESI. The total disallowed amount was Rs.2,45,561. The case was escalated to the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) where the initial disallowance was upheld, referencing the amendments to Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B of the Finance Act, 2021.
The primary legal contention by VRT Exports revolved around the retrospective applicability of the amendments introduced in the Finance Act 2021. The company argued that the amendments specifying the deadlines for PF and ESI contributions should only apply prospectively and not to the transactions done before the amendment took effect.
The Tribunal, led by Shri Saktijit Dey, Judicial Member, deliberated on whether the amendments to Section 36(1)(va) and Section 43B, which explicitly clarify the due dates for PF and ESI payments, should impact assessments made for years prior to the amendment. The Tribunal noted that similar cases had been adjudicated in favor of the assessee when payments were made before the due date of filing the return under Section 139(1) of the Act, despite being after the due date specified by employment-related acts.
In its decision, the Tribunal sided with the assessee, stating that the disallowed deductions for PF and ESI contributions should be allowed as the payments were indeed made before the due date of the income tax return filing. The Tribunal referenced several precedents, including a significant decision from the Delhi High Court, which emphasized that legislative intent was critical in determining the timing of such contributions.
This judgment sets a precedent for similar cases regarding the timing of employee contributions to PF and ESI, particularly concerning the retrospective application of legislative amendments. It underscores the importance of legislative clarity and the need for employers to comply with contribution deadlines to avoid potential disallowances.
The Tribunal’s decision in the case of VRT Exports Pvt Ltd vs. the Assistant Director of Income Tax provides crucial insights into how amendments to tax laws are interpreted in terms of their application and impact on past and future assessments. For companies, staying abreast of such changes is vital for compliance and financial planning.
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform