This article explores the ITAT Delhi’s decision in the case of CanLah Investments Pte. Ltd. versus the Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bengaluru, concerning the assessment year 2019-20. The primary focus is on the dispute over capital gains tax treatment under the India-Singapore Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
The appeal was filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which arose from the intimation issued by the CPC, Bengaluru, under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case discusses significant aspects of international tax law, particularly the application of the DTAA provisions relating to capital gains and the taxability of income derived from derivatives.
The appellant, CanLah Investments Pte. Ltd., a Singapore-based company, contended that its capital gains from equity shares and derivative transactions in India were not taxable under the specific provisions of the Indo-Singapore DTAA. However, discrepancies in the processing of the return by the CPC led to this legal challenge. The Tribunal examined various legal nuances, including the interpretation of ‘capital assets’ and the application of treaty benefits to foreign institutional investors.
The ITAT remanded the case back to the CIT(A) for a comprehensive examination on merits. This decision highlights the complexities involved in the taxation of foreign investors and the critical role of proper procedural adherence in claiming treaty benefits. The judgment also underscores the necessity for clarity in the tax return forms and proper compliance with the regulatory framework to avoid disputes.
CanLah Investments Pte. Ltd. vs ADIT, CPC Bengaluru: Capital Gains Dispute for AY 2019-20
Manage the increasing number of hearings effortlessly by leveraging the legal AI revolution We are India's Leading revolutionary AI-powered legal platform where you can get enough insights into top cases and judgements.
Research Platform